BANKING SUPERVISION
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF SUPERVISION IN ESTONIA
In 1997, the development of the banking supervision
continued under the concept evolved in earlier years. As
before, the emphasis was put on applying internationally
acknowledged principles of supervision.
Proceeding from the principle that in the conditions of the market economy the credit institutions themselves hold
responsibility for the results of their business activity,
the task of the banking supervision cannot be direct
intervention in the work of the bank management because this
would reduce the disciplining role of the market.
Interference in the everyday activities of credit
institutions is allowed only in case of a breach of law or
other legal acts regulating the activities of banks, or when
unjustifiably high risks are taken that can endanger the
interests of creditors.
In 1997, the formation of a complex and autonomous
institution of banking supervision continued. However, we
must differentiate between the functional integrity of the
banking supervision and the integrity of the financial market
supervision.
The functional integrity of the banking supervision means that all its functions are centred into one
organization, starting from the formation of the database and
ending with applying sanctions, designing regulations for
credit institutions and arranging international co-operation.
In this area, the Banking Supervision increased its efforts
on working out instructions regulating the reporting
procedures of the banks.
The integrity of the financial market supervision means consolidating under universal supervision all the
different fields of activity pursued by the institutions
subjected to supervision. Here, preparations for the
transition to the consolidated supervision of the banking
groups in 1998 were finished and co-operation between the
different supervisory bodies of the financial market was
strengthened. The aim of this trend of development is to
switch over to unified financial supervision. The concept of
this transition is scheduled to be worked out in the next
couple of years.
Particular attention was focussed on capital adequacy,
changes in the circle of owners and the resulting
concentration of the share capital and decision-making, the
quality of assets, intra-bank procedures, as well as the
existence and adequacy of the information and risk management
systems. Additional instructions were drawn up for market
risk evaluation and management.
In accordance with the annual schedule, all Estonian banks
were inspected at least once a year and follow-up examination
was also carried out. The role of monitoring was enhanced and
its share in preparations for on-site inspection increased
correspondingly.
DEVELOPMENT
OF BANKING SECTOR AND PRIORITIES OF SUPERVISION
Despite the rapid development of the Estonian banking
market, this dynamic process will continue also in the
future. In 1997, three banks stopped their activities. This
serves to indicate that not all credit institutions,
particularly the smaller banks, have been able to secure
their market position and that certain structural shifts will
also take place in the future.
In the conditions of ever tightening competition, banks
are forced to widen the selection of their services and
improve their quality in order to maintain and expand their
market share. In order to secure their market share, banks
continued to focus on definite groups of customers.
The share of operations with securities continued to
increase in the activities of credit institutions. This is a
global trend which in Estonia accelerated in 1997 in
particular. Favourable opportunities for this were provided
by the Tallinn Stock Exchange that was launched in 1996.
Besides trading in securities, banks expand their activities
also in other sectors of the financial market, in insurance
and financial investments. This changes the criteria of
evaluating the market share of the banks, although
credibility will still be based on the banks' equity
capital which grows through additional investments. In 1997,
Estonian banks also expanded their activities into other
Baltic countries, Russia and the Ukraine, where subsidiaries
were established or qualifying holdings were acquired in
credit institutions, insurance companies and leasing firms.
As a result of the above, the share of the consolidated
groups of credit and financial institutions increased on the
financial market. As the activities of the banks become more
complex, the risks increase as well. This, in its turn, sets
higher demands on supervision and at the same time also
determines the priorities of development. These include:
the development of the market risk evaluation and
management systems the necessity of which derives from the
banks' operations with securities;
introduction of the requirement of consolidated
reporting by banks and transition to consolidated
supervision;
implementation of the internationally acknowledged
principles of banking supervision; further strengthening of
co-operation with other supervisory bodies of the financial
market;
drafting of the concept for the transition to unified
supervision of the financial market.
REVISION OF BANKING-RELATED LEGISLATION
Although there are still quite a few gaps in the
banking-related legislation, progress in this area was slower
than expected. The new version of the Credit Institutions
Act, the Deposit Insurance Fund Act as well as the
Anti-money Laundering Act and the Securities Market
Act are still waiting to be passed and implemented by
Riigikogu (the Parliament). The first three draft laws are
currently ready to be discussed by Riigikogu, the drafting of
the law on the securities market is still underway.
RISK MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
The evaluation of the effect and efficiency of the risk management systems is becoming one of the main concerns of
supervision. The downward movement on the stock exchange
and liquidity problems in the autumn of 1997 proved that
credit institutions with efficient risk management systems
are able to operate without significant losses also in the
periods of crisis.
The reports submitted by the banks to Eesti Pank do not
enable an exact evaluation of the efficiency of the risk
management systems used in credit institutions. From the
point of view of banking supervision, the identification,
measuring, monitoring and management of possible risks and
the creation of the necessary information systems is the
responsibility of the management and council of each
individual bank and a matter of the intra-bank work
arrangement, supervised by the bank's internal audit unit.
The bank's external auditor also has to evaluate these
systems in the course of the examination of the bank's
annual and interim reports.
Banking Supervision examines the correspondence of the
risk management and information systems to the requirements
in the course of on-site inspection, proceeding from the
specific activity and market position of the concrete credit
institution.
In 1997, particularly after the extensive freezing of
accounts of the Baltic credit institutions in the banks of St
Petersburg, Estonian banks began to pay more attention to
evaluating the country risk.
PRUDENTIAL RATIOS
The prudential ratios set on Estonian credit
institutions correspond roughly to the requirements of the
European Union (EU), although, in view of the possible
dangers of our rapidly developing banking system, they are
sometimes even stricter. Among the changes made in 1997,
the most important was the increase of the minimum capital
adequacy ratio. In addition to this, the risk weights
were increased for the Estonian local governments and claims
guaranteed by them. In order to increase the liquidity of
credit institutions, an additional liquidity requirement
was introduced (see Monetary
Policy, Measures to Strengthen the Liquidity System). All
the above changes were closely linked with the rapid
developments in the Estonian macroeconomy in the spring and
summer of 1997.
The improvement of the prudential ratios continued in
accordance with the recommendations of the EU and the Basel
Banking Supervisory Committee, relying on the experience of
banking supervision of the EU countries. So far, capital
adequacy has been calculated on the basis of the credit risk;
among the market risk factors only the foreign currency risk
is considered and the risks of trading with the foreign
exchange options have been disregarded. The market risk
will be included in full in 1998, after the introduction of
the new, revised rules for calculating capital adequacy.
With the transition to consolidated supervision the
prudential ratios imposed on credit institutions will be
applied to the consolidated groups as well.
Other important changes provide for the introduction of
the tier 3 capital, specification of the procedures for
classifying and provisioning of loans and closer observance
of the banks' off-balance sheet activities.
MANAGEMENT AND INTERNAL AUDIT UNIT
As banks expand their activities in other areas of the
financial sector as well as other business spheres, financial
and mixed activities conglomerates have emerged, in which
the banks have a leading role. This requires management
rearrangements within each individual organization as well as
within the entire group.
The decentralization of banking services continued. The bank headquarters first of all comprise such general
service areas as information technology, banking technology
and accounting. This enables to economize on costs and
standardize the activities of branch offices. More and more
banks apply the principle of financial inspection under which
branches make decisions without the interference of the head
office and the latter judges the work of the branches by
their financial results.
The changes also set new requirements on the management information systems. The success of management and
achieving the goals has become more and more dependent on
timely, relevant and adequate information. The lack of
authentic information complicates the competent
decision-making and managing the risks involved in the work
of credit institutions. Therefore, supervision focuses more
and more on the situation of the bank management and the
required information systems.
A well-functioning and independent internal audit unit is essential for improving the management of credit
institutions and the required information systems. The years
1995 and 1996 can be regarded as the formation of internal
audit, while in 1997 already the managements of the banks
expressed their clear support to the work of internal audit
units, particularly in larger credit institutions. In 1998,
the rest of the banks should also devote more attention to
creating the environment necessary for the successful
functioning of internal audit and recruiting experienced and
qualified staff.
SUPERVISION OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS
The security and reliability of information systems is an
important guarantee for the safety of every credit
institution. The rapid development of the technology of
information systems sets high requirements also on the
management of this sphere. Thus, inspecting the management of
information systems is the highest priority of supervision in
this area.
Proceeding from the results of the 1996 questionnaire
on the security of information systems, definite requirements
were introduced on the information systems of credit
institutions in 1997 and these are required for all credit
institutions. Another new requirement is that, in
addition to the annual external auditing of the information
systems, the Banking Supervision carries out its own audit.
Favourable conditions for this are provided by the close
co-operation between Supervision and banks in information
security.
RESTRUCTURING OF THE BANKING SYSTEM
Alongside the rapid development of credit institutions,
the differentiation of their development level continued in
1997. The banks that can offer their customers the widest
choice of services and products strengthen their positions on
the market, at the same time maintaining the necessary
standards of risk management. On the other hand, there are
also banks that find it hard to keep their position on the
market.
The INKO Balti Pank (INKO Baltic Bank) developed first difficulties in August. The extraordinary
meeting of the bank's shareholders therefore decided in
favour of the voluntary liquidation of the bank.
Eesti Innovatsioonipank (Estonian Innovation Bank) got into difficulties in the first days of 1997. While the Banking Supervision tried to get more information
on the circle of owners and origin of the bank's share
capital, a number of violations were discovered. As the
Innovation Bank failed to follow the instructions of Eesti
Pank, on 10 September the Board of Eesti Pank decided to
revoke the license.
At the beginning of the year the merger of Põhja-Eesti Pank (North Estonian Bank) with Eesti Ühispank (Union Bank of Estonia) was completed. The merger agreement, which provided for the transfer of all assets and liabilities
of the North Estonian Bank to the Union Bank, was signed at
the beginning of January and took effect in the middle of
April after being approved by the shareholders' meetings of
the two banks.
INTERNATIONAL
CO-OPERATION IN THE FIELD OF SUPERVISION
Due to the rapid development of the Estonian banking
sector and the relative smallness of the domestic market,
Estonian credit institutions expand their activities to the
international market, which also sets new requirements to the
Banking Supervision. In order to meet these requirements,
co-operation was strengthened with the financial supervision
institutions of other countries in the field of practical
supervision as well as in the development and unification of
the theoretical principles.
Practical co-operation is mainly focussed on arranging supervision over the consolidated banking groups active on
the international level. Here the principle of home
country supervision is applied under which credit
institutions licensed in Estonia and their subsidiaries
abroad are subject to the Estonian Banking Supervision. In
order to strengthen the principle of home country supervision
the Estonian Banking Supervision signed an agreement with the
Finnish Financial Supervision in 1995. In the near future a
similar agreement will be signed with the Russian Banking
Supervision and an agreement has also been proposed to the
banking supervision authorities of Latvia, Lithuania and the
Ukraine. Co-operation is based on the mutual exchange of
confidential information necessary for supervision, as well
as assistance for carrying out on-site inspection. In
relations with countries where the home country on-site
inspection is made difficult due to local legislation, more
attention is devoted to the efficiency of the bank's
internal auditing measures on the activities of its
subsidiaries abroad.
Another sphere of international co-operation is examining the reliability and financial status of non-resident
investors and owners. This involves the exchange of
information on the background of potential investors and
owners in accordance with bilateral agreements concluded with
the supervisory bodies of other countries.
Due to the expansion of Estonian banks abroad and
preparations for joining the EU, more attention is paid to
the issue of harmonizing Estonian banking requirements and
supervision methods with international standards. The
point of departure here is the banking directives of the EU
and the methodological papers issued by the Basel Banking
Supervisory Committee.
The Estonian Banking Supervision have taken an active part
in the work of the Group of Banking Supervisors from Central
and Eastern European Countries. The Group was formed in 1996
and is aimed at co-ordinating the methodological and
practical supervision activities of its member countries as
well as relations between the member countries and the Basel
Banking Supervisory Committee.
In the field of drafting legislation and banking
regulations, Banking Supervision have received regular
technical assistance from the International Monetary Fund and
the World Bank, both in the form of consultations as well as
periodical technical assistance missions.
In the context of the globalization of financial markets
and Estonia's future membership in the European Union,
international co-operation in banking supervision requires
even more attention and closer contacts.
|