WORLD ECONOMY AND FINANCIAL MARKETS IN 1997
MAJOR INDUSTRIAL
COUNTRIES
The year 1997 was relatively successful for the world
economy[1] . According to the preliminary data, the gross production of the world's countries increased about 3.25%,
which is the highest figure in the last decade. The
development was regionally uneven - the fastest developing
area, regardless of the end-of-the-year crisis, was still Asia, whereas the former CIS countries focused on stopping the
economic downfall. The world's major industrial countries
continued to display a modest economic growth - among the G7
countries the USA, Canada and Great Britain were strong
leaders. Economic growth accelerated in continental Europe as
well (see Table 1.1). The
enlargement of the economic growth base by, first and
foremost, Latin-America as well as by the Central and Eastern
European countries gave a favourable impetus to the
development of international trade, its volume growing by
about 8%.
Apart from positive development trends, the other
remarkable event in the second half of 1997 was the
deepening financial and economic crisis in Asia, which
became explicit in the sudden weakening of currencies of
several relatively fast developing countries (Thailand,
Indonesia, Malaysia, Republic of Korea, etc) and a drop in
internationally influential securities markets. At the end of
the year major industrial countries and the International
Monetary Fund (IMF) developed a comprehensive assistance
programme, helping several South-East Asian countries with
standby loans. Such international attention to the crisis in
Asia is warranted because of its effect on the outlook of
global economy. Considering that the development of the Asian
economic leader Japan is not so rapid any more, the crucial
issue in 1998 will be whether the economy of the rest of
the (mainly industrial) countries is strong enough to
withstand the crisis in Asia and prevent the economic
situation from worsening even further. Asia is counted
for about one third of the global gross production, 31% of
the USA and 9.3% of the EU exports.
Economic difficulties in Asia would probably hamper not
only the economic growth but also price level increase,
as sharply lower exchange rates make Asian goods cheaper for
importers. Although the Asian economic crisis is not yet
over, its significant retarding impact on the global economic
growth in 1998 is evident already.
In 1997, the singularity of the economic growth in major
industrial countries lied in the fact that regardless of
the growth pace exceeding the long-term trend in production
and consumption, the inflation remained low and even
decreased in several countries, including the USA. On one
hand it was due to lower prices of several raw materials
(Commodity Research Bureau (CRB) index based on the prices of
17 most commonly used raw materials dropped by 4.6%),
increasing labour productivity, a more efficient use of
labour, stronger international competition, and an influx of
cheap consumer goods from developing countries to the major
industrial ones; on the other hand - due to the
determination of central banks to contain the inflation.
Financial markets were relatively volatile in 1997.
Compared to 1996, the magnitude of changes increased both in
foreign exchange and stock markets. As an exception the
fluctuation of exchange rates decreased in the prospective
euro area. The US dollar continued to strengthen against
all main currencies; in Europe the German mark weakened
against most of the currencies (see Table 1.2).
In stock markets the year can be divided into two distinctive periods. Markets developed from January to August
without major setbacks and main stock exchange indices set
records, reaching the peak in late July-early August. In the
second half of the year the growth of stock prices was
restrained by the deepening economic downturn in Asia and
stock market indices plunged several times, although never
falling below the level of the beginning of the year. At
the year end there was still an exceptional increase on the
stock markets of all major industrial countries except Japan
(see Table 1.3). However, the
fall on Japan's stock market was still small relative to
other Asian markets - shares of South-East Asian crisis
countries (Korea, Thailand, Indonesia, etc) lost about half
of their value in 1997.
Notwithstanding the larger than the average increase of
9%, bond markets stayed relatively stable in 1997. Interest rates dropped in all major markets, contributing to a more
significant bond price boost than forecasted in interest rate
projections earlier in the year. The increase was
relatively stable (see Table 1.4).
Such a global trend was preconditioned by an evenly low
inflation in all major industrial countries. Another reason
for the price increase was a combination of decreasing supply
due to fiscal discipline and an increasing demand for
government bonds. The demand increase can be attributed to
the capital leaving Asia and moving now to the bonds of major
industrial countries as well as to legislation amendments in
several countries that forced pension funds to increase the
share of bonds in their investment portfolios.
Prices of government bonds grew most in Great Britain
(14.7%) where the long-term interest rates were higher
relative to other European countries and decreased more than
average due to general convergence. As most of the above
factors will continue to have their influence in 1998 as
well, the same trend can be expected to continue in bond
markets at least at the beginning of the year.
USA
In the USA the economic growth continued for the
sixth year in a row, reaching 3.8% according to
preliminary data and surpassing most forecasts. Unemployment
decreased from 5.4 to 5%. In December, the unemployment
rate dropped to 4.6%, the lowest in last 24 years.
Regardless of the tightening in the labour market, that
ordinarily leads to an acceleration in the increase in
wages and prices, the consumer price index dropped from 3
to 2.3% and down to 1.7% in December. Increase in income
and wealth of the people boosted consumer optimism to the
highest of this decade. In 1998, the economic growth is
forecasted to slow to 3.5% (according to several
analysts, even to 2.5%) and the unemployment to decrease
further.
The significant economic growth in 1997 strengthened
the dollar further against other major currencies. The
strong dollar and increasing domestic demand contributed
to the rapid growth in import demand and increased the
trade deficit to an estimated USD 115 billion. It is
forecast to continue increasing in 1998.
The modest rate of inflation was the main reason why
the US Federal Reserve increased its bench-mark interest
rate only once (in March by 0.25%) to 5.5% where it
remained for the rest of the year. In the second half of
the year, the crisis in Asia prevented a further raise in
the bench-mark rate, increasing, thus, the turbulence in
financial markets and strengthening the expectations of
an economic slowdown.
Japan
Japan's economic growth was slower than expected
and did not exceed 1% according to preliminary estimates.
Economic disturbances in continental Asia extended to
many Japanese financial institutions. In November, the
fourth largest investment company in Japan, Yamaichi
Securities, had to close down.
Foreign exchange and financial concerns in Asian
emerging countries came at an opportune time for Japan.
As the domestic demand decreased, Japan's expectations
of avoiding the economic downfall were mainly based on
growing exports boosted by the weakening of the yen. It
worked in 1997 and the current account surplus increased
by 42.4%. At the end of the year the situation changed as
currencies of several Japan's competitors weakened more
than the yen. In 1998, the trade balance surplus is
forecast to increase by only USD 6 billion, ie 0.1% of
GDP.
Due to the modest economic growth, the unemployment
rate remained unchanged at 3.4% compared to the previous
year. The inflation rate increased from 0.1 to 1.7%. By
the end of the year most of the large businesses
considered the market outlook unfavourable and therefore
1998 will be difficult for the Japanese economy, possibly
resulting in an economic crisis. Because of the currently
low interest rates the Japanese central bank cannot
stimulate the economy by lowering them further.
EUROPEAN UNION
MEMBER COUNTRIES
The year 1997 was better than the previous year for
the members of the European Union (EU): according to
preliminary estimates GDP increased by 2.6%. The
economic growth was largest in Ireland (8.0%), followed
by Finland (5.9%) and Great Britain (2.9%). The three
largest economies in continental Europe (Germany, France
and Italy) experienced higher economic growth than in
1996, but it was not high enough, however, to decrease
the high unemployment rates (over 10%) which prevailed in
these countries as well as in other EU member states.
One of the major factors influencing the development
of the EU countries was the European Monetary Union
(EMU). The probable countries joining the single
currency area were identified: out of the 15 EU
countries, probably four - Great Britain, Denmark,
Sweden, and Greece - would stay outside the first wave. Although the participation of the remaining 11 countries is not
absolutely certain, favourable prerequisites have been
established through economic convergence based on
Maastricht criteria (see Table
1.5).
Major progress has been made in restraining inflation: only Greece was unable to meet the required level.
Reducing the budget deficit to 3% of GDP or below
was more complicated but still achievable. The government
debt criterion in the strictest sense was achievable
for only four member states. Nevertheless the financial
markets have already discounted the timely start of the
third stage of the EMU, and the long-term interest rate
differential in candidate countries converged to below
0.35 percentage points in late 1997.
1998 is important for the EMU as in early May
countries joining the EMU in the first round will be
finally determined and their bilateral exchange rates
will be established. The European Central Bank will be
established in July. The single currency will be
introduced into accounting on 1 January 1999. The
forecasted economic growth of the euro-countries in 1998
is 2.9%, inflation rate 2% and unemployment rate 12%.
Germany
The German economy developed somewhat slower than
expected in 1998, GDP growing by 2.2%. Better
performance was hampered by the growth being mainly
export-led; exports grew by 10.7%, supported by the
weakening of the German mark. The growth of domestic
private consumption was low (0.2%) whereas public
consumption even decreased by 0.4%. The gross production
in the construction sector continued to decline, falling
by 2.2%. The high and ever increasing unemployment rate
reached 11.8% by the end of the year and hindered any
increase in domestic demand. The high unemployment rate
is caused by relatively high ULC and the after-effect of
the reunification of the eastern and western parts of
Germany (the unemployment level in East Germany reached
18% in 1997).
Although the inflation rate increased slightly over
the year, its growth was still contained to below 2%. Due
to the modest price increase, the central bank increased
the repo rate just once by 0.3%.
The surplus of the trade balance contributed to the
reduction of current account deficit to 0.3% of GDP and
there is hope to achieve a balanced current account in
1998.
Future prospects depend both on the domestic demand
development and on the impact of the Asian crisis. As
exports to Asia are only 12% of Germany's total
exports, the direct impact of the Asian crisis on
Germany's GDP should be limited to 2.4% of GDP.
Considering the factors restraining the growth of the
domestic demand, a modest economic growth is predicted
for 1998 (2.5%), but an increase in unemployment is also
possible.
Great Britain
The British economy grew relatively fast in 1997:
GDP increased by 2.9%. Unlike Germany, the growth was
supported by increasing domestic private consumption
(4.2%). Such a growth rate cannot probably be maintained
for long and the economic growth should slow down in
1998. It is mainly caused by a raise in the base interest
rates, tighter fiscal policy and the strong pound
sterling (which appreciated by 12.6% against the German
mark in 1997) as well as the impact of the economic
crisis in Asia.
The economic growth was accompanied by growing
inflation, reaching 3.7% by the end of the year. The
central bank increased its bench-mark interest rate by
1.25% in order to restrain the price level increase;
nevertheless the price index of main consumer goods did
not drop below the CB's target level of 2.5%.
The unemployment decreased, reaching 5.1% - the
lowest level of the last 18 years - in December. The
labour market tightness is forecast to continue in 1998,
when unemployment rate is expected to drop to 4.8%. If
the rapid growth in wages were to continue, it could add
inflationary pressure on the economy.
Although the trade balance remained negative, a GBP
116 million current account surplus was achieved. A
further growth of the trade deficit will probably lead to
a current account deficit, forecast to be about GBP 11.5
billion or 1.4% of GDP.
Sweden
Economic growth in Sweden was slower than in the
European Union: GDP grew by 1.8%. The 2% increase in
private consumption acted as the main contributor whereas
public consumption and corporate investments decreased.
For 1998 a faster economic growth is forecast (2.8%). The
economic position of Sweden in Europe is going to change
as Sweden will be one of the four countries remaining
outside of the third stage of the EMU for the time being.
The rate of inflation remained a low 0.9% in 1997. In
1998, the inflation rate should increase to 1.5%. The
unemployment rate did not change considerably either (on
the average 8%), although it is expected to decrease in
the environment of improving economic growth in 1998.
Both the trade balance and the current account were in
surplus in 1997 which is expected to grow this year.
Finland
Unlike Sweden, Finland is clearly oriented towards
joining the EMU. After the economic crisis of early
1990s, Finnish economy grew rapidly in 1997: GDP grew by
5.9%. Corporate investments increased by 11.3%,
creating a favourable environment for further economic
growth. Developments in forestry, metal industry, machine
building and telecommunications were especially
significant. The economic growth projection for 1998 is
4.5%. It also depends on developments in Asia, a major
market for Finnish exports and investments in recent
years.
Inflation accelerated in 1997 but was only 1.3%.
Inflation will continue to grow in 1998 due to the rapid
economic growth, reaching 1.9% according to forecasts.
The unemployment rate, 14.5% in 1997, should decrease to
12.5%.
As exports grew significantly, both trade balance and
current account were in surplus. The current account
surplus is forecast to decrease in 1998 but it should
still be about 5% of GDP.
TRANSITION
ECONOMIES OF CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE
Survey of Emerging
Markets
The financial crisis in South-East Asia changed
considerably the risk assessment of emerging countries, including Central and Eastern European countries[2] by major international financial markets in summer and spring of 1997. Increasing capital flows into
emerging countries over the recent years had brought down
the interest margin, simplifying debt refinancing.
Beginning from mid-1997 the process reversed and interest
rate started to rise, becoming a concern for countries in
South-East Asia who are more dependent on foreign capital
than Central and Eastern European countries.
As a result of an attack against the Czech koruna, the central bank had to give up the fixed exchange rate
against the German mark and US dollar and switch to
managed exchange rate. The Slovak koruna and Polish
zloty were under pressure as well, but the exchange rate
policy was not changed. In Slovakia the central bank had
to continue the stringent monetary policy expressed in
reduced liquidity in the banking system and increased
interest rate.
A major event in the monetary policy of Central and
Eastern European countries in 1997 was the adoption of
the currency board system in Bulgaria. It helped to
achieve an initial economic balance following the very
high inflation and a significant drop in real GDP earlier
last year.
Czech Republic
Several years of successful growth were followed by
a setback in Czech economy in 1997, where the growth of
GDP slowed down to about 1.3% from 4.1% in 1996 (see Table 1.6).
The continuous inflow of foreign capital in previous
years had promoted the expansion of domestic demand
whereas reforms on corporate level were weak and, thus,
prevented the increase in labour productivity in domestic
industry. The rapidly increasing demand pushed the
inflation rate up and due to the fixed exchange rate, the
international competitiveness of Czech businesses started
to decrease. This led to current account deficit reaching
7.6% of GDP in 1996.
In 1997, instability in the external sector deepened
and by the end of May investors continued pressure on
koruna and forced the Czech central bank to give up the
fixed exchange rate policy and to switch to the managed
exchange rate. As a result of this change, the Czech
koruna depreciated against the currencies of major trade
partners. However, the extent of the depreciation was
much lesser than that in several SEA countries.
The weakening of the exchange rate accelerated export
growth. As the tightening of fiscal and monetary policies
oriented to restraining domestic demand prevented the
growth of imports, the current account deficit decreased
to 5% of GDP in the second half of 1997.
Due to a lack of political consensus, the long-awaited
privatization of large banks was not launched in 1997.
Preparations to privatize several larger banks have
nevertheless been started.
Poland
The remarkable growth in the Polish economy in 1997
was mainly based on a significant growth of industrial
output and increasing domestic demand. Industrial
output grew due to increasing labour productivity and
employment. Domestic demand was boosted both by
increasing real wages and booming consumer lending. These
factors contributed to the increase in the current
account deficit to 3.5% of GDP (compared to 1% in 1996).
The budget deficit was 1.4% of GDP in 1997, being far
below the forecast made earlier in the year due to the
rapid economic growth.
High inflation caused by increasing demand and the
crawling peg system remained a problem. Fighting
inflation and speculative pressures, the central bank has
maintained high interest rates (exceeding 20%), thus
promoting foreign portfolio investments and money supply.
The central bank has taken active steps in its monetary
policy to counteract the above influence. In order to
make commercial banks raise interest rates, the central
bank started to accept 6 and 9 months deposits from the
public last autumn.
The share of state holdings in the banking sector is
still quite high. At the end of 1997, one of the leading
commercial banks was privatized; several more will be
sold to the private sector.
Hungary
1997 was a successful year for Hungary following
several years of stagnation. The higher external
demand for industrial output and investments into the
private sector spurred economic growth. As the government
reduced its budget deficit and external debt, the share
of the public sector in GDP growth was close to zero.
In 1997, the budget deficit was about 4.1% of GDP due
to large debt servicing costs. Without debt servicing
costs the national budget had a primary surplus of 1.9%
of GDP.
In 1997, the average inflation was 18.3% compared to
23.6% in 1996. Meanwhile, the average wages increased by
21-22%. Higher real income led to an increase in savings
by about 9%.
The contained domestic demand and increased external
demand improved the balance of the external sector
considerably in 1997. The current account deficit/GDP
ratio decreased. The external debt fell from 64% in 1996
to 58% in 1997.
As the inflation rate decreased, the central bank
could cut the devaluation rate of the forint from 1.2 to
1.1% per month in April and then to 1.0% in August 1997.
The restructuring of the banking system has developed
fast in Hungary. All major banks were privatized in 1996
whereas most of the banking sector is now controlled by
foreign investors. In 1997, the banking system
development was stable.
Slovenia
In Slovenia GDP grew by 3.3% in 1997, whereas the
growth of the industrial output reached only 1.3%.
The modest development is mainly due to the slow property
reform and few foreign investments made into industry.
High real interest rates, reaching about 10%, are also
restraining the development of businesses. Economic
growth was backed by external demand increasing by 7.5%;
domestic demand grew by 3%.
As several of the administratively regulated prices
were raised, the inflation rate remained relatively high
at 9.1%. Real wages grew by 4%, a bit less than in 1996.
The unemployment rate was 15%.
It was difficult to implement the 1997 budget as the
budget law was adopted only at the end of the year,
weakening the control over expenditures. This led to a
1.3% budget deficit. The surplus of the general
government was 0.3% of GDP in 1996.
Several commercial banks, including the largest one by
total assets, are still owned by the state.
Lithuania
According to Lithuania's official statistics, the
economic growth was close to 6.4% in the first three
quarters of 1997. By the end of the year the figure fell
to 6%. Considering both consumption and production,
GDP grew mainly at the expense of the government sector.
The inflation rate slowed down considerably in 1997.
At the end of 1996, the annual growth of the consumer
price index was 13.1%; according to official statistics
it dropped to 8.4% by the end of 1997. Prices of goods
increased a bit more than five per cent and prices of
services by 15% year-on-year. The growth of the consumer
price index slowed down and was only 0.9% in December,
whereas the index reflecting price changes in mining and
processing industries decreased by 2.9% year-on-year.
In spite of lower inflation, the growth of average
wages gained speed. In the second half of the year the
real wages increased by 17% as compared to 1996.
The 1997 budget implementation mostly complied with
forecasts and the budget deficit was about 1.9% of GDP at
the end of the year. The government external and internal
debt increased by 21 and 44%, respectively, over the
year. The government external debt/GDP ratio was low:
about 15%.
The current account deficit in the first three
quarters of the year was 8.5% of GDP, considerably worse
compared to 6.6% in the first nine months of 1996. The
increase was mostly caused by a 28% increase in imports.
Exports increased by 17% over the same period. The
current account deficit was increased by the restrained
growth of the surplus of the services balance.
Earlier in the year the Lithuanian central bank
disclosed a monetary programme that involved giving up
the currency board system. In compliance with the
programme the central bank started deposit and repo
auctions for commercial banks. The stable development of
private banks as well as the significant government
participation in the banking sector have influenced the
results of 1997. The state maintained its ownership in
three major commercial banks.
Latvia
Latvia's economy grew by 5.6% during the first
nine months; annual GDP growth was about 6.5%. The
service sector (transit traffic and trade) was the main
contributor to the economic growth. The growth of
industrial output accelerated in the second half of the
year, reaching 16.2% in the fourth quarter.
Latvia had the lowest inflation of the Baltic
countries in 1997. Annual growth of the consumer
price index was 7.0% in December. The producer price
index grew by 3.8%. Both in Lithuania and in Latvia, the
price level increase was restrained by the depreciation
of the currencies of major foreign trade partners from
Western Europe against the local currency.
The fiscal policy was successful in 1997, and the
budget tax receipts surpassed all hopes. Instead of the
planned 2% deficit, a surplus of 63 million lats was
achieved (without considering the social insurance
funds). The successful budgetary performance contributed
to the significant reduction of government internal debt.
The government external debt grew by only a few
million lats in 1997. The concern of the external sector
is the sharply increasing current account deficit (7.9%
of GDP in the first three quarters). The deficit grew
mainly because the surplus of the services balance
decreased.
The banking sector developed well in Latvia. In the
second half of the year the loan volume grew
significantly (the annual growth reaching 75% in the
fourth quarter). Loans to residents were about 12% of GDP
at the end of the year.
No major changes took place in Latvian monetary
policy. The central bank continued de facto pegging
the lat to the SDR currency basket, thus, promoting the
harmonious development of financial markets.
Russia
Russia's economy stabilized in 1997 for the first
time after seven years of decline. The stabilization
is due to a modest growth in the industrial output (about
1.9%) and a lower than expected drop in agricultural
output. On the demand side, decreasing investments and
diminishing surplus of the trade balance are of major
concern. The growth was mainly due to larger private
consumption, caused by an increase of 3% in real income.
The restructuring of industry is still modest. In
1997, foreign direct investments doubled, reaching USD
4.4 billion. The unemployment rate was quite high - 9%.
Significant success was achieved in reducing
inflation. At the end of 1996, the annual growth of the
consumer price index was 22%, but by December 1997, it
had dropped to 11%. The stabilization of the exchange
rate of the ruble and its maintenance within the currency
band against the US dollar helped to reduce inflation
significantly. The annual growth of money supply was 30%
in December, caused by an extensive inflow of short-term
foreign capital in the first half of the year.
Maintaining the state budget continued to be a major
concern. 47% of the planned annual revenue were collected
within the first nine months of 1997; therefore, the
government budget deficit reached about 5.3% of GDP. The
unpaid salaries in the public sector totalled USD 1.6
billion by the end of 1997.
The financial crisis in Asia caused a flight of
short-term capital from Russia. The accompanying higher
interest rates complicated loan servicing by the
government. The profitability of short-term government
bonds was 20% in early October and increased to 30% by
the end of the year. In order to reduce the selling
pressure of assets quoted in rubles, the central bank had
to increase twice the refinancing and lombard rates to 28
and 36%, respectively, at the end of the year. This
complicated the position of weaker commercial banks.
[1] Publications by Deutsche Morgan Grenfell (DMG) and Salomon Smith Barney, data from REUTERS, Bloomberg and Eesti Pank Financial Markets Department have been used in this overview.
[2] Publications by central banks, Bank for International Settlements and Wiener Institut für Internationale Wirtschaftsvergleiche and Creditanstalt have been used in this overview.
|